Tonic interocular suppression, binocular summation, and the visual evoked potential.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE Psychophysical studies have shown that a dark-adapted eye exerts a tonic interocular suppression (TIS) upon spatial vision mediated by the contralateral eye. The present study was designed to demonstrate TIS by means of visual evoked potential (VEP) procedures. METHODS Evoked cortical potentials were obtained in response to reversing checkerboard patterns with fundamental Fourier frequencies between 3 and 12 cycles per degree. Responses were obtained under monocular viewing conditions when the contralateral "adapting" eye was dark adapted, under monocular viewing conditions when the adapted state of the adapting eye was experimentally manipulated, or under binocular viewing conditions. Data were collected from three healthy young men, two native regarding purpose of experimentation. RESULTS Regardless of spatial frequency, monocular responses evoked by stimulating a "test eye" were always smaller in amplitude when the contralateral adapting eye was dark adapted than when adapted to a dim, homogeneous field. The monocular evoked response obtained in the presence of an interocular adapting field was similar in amplitude to the binocular evoked response. During dark adaptation of the contralateral adapting eye, the amplitude of the monocular evoked response decreased: the time course of this decline follows that of psychophysically measured rod thresholds in the directly adapted eye. CONCLUSIONS TIS is easily demonstrated by means of VEP as well as psychophysical procedures. The well-known increase in VEP amplitude resulting from binocular viewing may be attributable to the removal of TIS rather than to "physiologic, binocular summation."
منابع مشابه
تاثیر هم افزایی دوچشمی بر مولفه های موج پتانسیل برانگیخته بینایی
Background : To determine the effect of binocular summation on the time domain transient VEP wave's components. Methods : The monocular and binocular transient visual evoked potentials of 21 normally vision volunteers 18 to 24 years (mean ± SD, 20.7 ± 1.9) during a reversing checkerboard stimulus with spatiotemporal frequency of 2.18-4 cpd-Hz were recorded. The amplitude and latency of N75,...
متن کاملBinocular Neurons in Parastriate Cortex: Interocular ‘Matching’ of Receptive Field Properties, Eye Dominance and Strength of Silent Suppression
Spike-responses of single binocular neurons were recorded from a distinct part of primary visual cortex, the parastriate cortex (cytoarchitectonic area 18) of anaesthetized and immobilized domestic cats. Functional identification of neurons was based on the ratios of phase-variant (F1) component to the mean firing rate (F0) of their spike-responses to optimized (orientation, direction, spatial ...
متن کاملPsychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
Visual mechanisms in primary visual cortex are suppressed by the superposition of gratings perpendicular to their preferred orientations. A clear picture of this process is needed to (i) inform functional architecture of image-processing models, (ii) identify the pathways available to support binocular rivalry, and (iii) generally advance our understanding of early vision. Here we use monoptic ...
متن کاملA novel way to make transient-VEPs a better predictor of human binocular integration.
To establish an electrophysiological marker of binocular vision, visual evoked potentials were recorded in normal observers for whom interocular refraction differences were induced with converging lenses under five dioptre conditions. Patterns of binocular interaction were categorized (facilitation, averaging or suppression) by comparing monocular and binocular responses. Quantitative and conti...
متن کاملThe Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimuli are in phase. But how do these processes affect our perception of binocular contrast? We measur...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
دوره 34 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993